Skip to main content

Blog Post 5-Chapter 6

In chapter 6, the authors discuss case building in terms of planning a presentation.  These presentations can be in the forms of essays, memorandum, papers, blogs, and more.  The authors state that when people want to make arguments, they need to elaborate on their claims and supports in order to be more persuasive.  Also, the case must use well-developed arguments and put them together in an appropriate manner for the audience of decision makers.  The topic that I found to be most interesting in this chapter was the concept of developing a convincing vision in order to engage and shape the audience on behalf of the cause.  So, first, it is important to learn the decision makers’ vision. Through learning their vision one can help make the decision maker abandon their world view through stories, or make them recognize that their vision has lost its relevance so that they are more likely to accept a new vision.  Second, by telling the story of the vision, decision makers are able to visualize and intensify their feelings towards the propositions.  Then, third, considering an example is important in order to show how they case could succeed.  I found the concept of developing a convincing vision to be interesting because I am always attempting new ways of persuasion in order to convince my parents or my friends into doing something.  So, by using these three steps I can better form a case and persuade those around me. However, I believe that this will not always work, especially with my parents, because there are people who are set in their ways and beliefs that will not be persuaded by just one presentation of a case.  

Comments

  1. I also think that developing a convincing vision is a really interesting concept. I think this is often used in political campaigns, especially when making campaign promises. By making these promises, candidates are shaping a vision in the minds of their followers of what the country (or state, or county, etc) will look like if they are elected. Oftentimes, this is an effective strategy, but many times, candidates fall short on their campaign promises. I also think this strategy is used in campaign attack ads. Candidates create a negative vision of what the country/state/county will look like if their opponent is elected. I think these are two common examples where creating a vision to persuade people is used. I also thought you made a good point about convincing people (on this case, your parents) who are more set in their ways. If people are to be persuaded, they have to be somewhat openminded and willing to hear other sides of an argument.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...

Chapter 10

There were a couple of terms I found in this chapter that I wish were explained a little more. First, the concept of uncritical responses to refutation is only covered briefly. I think that this is one of the most fundamental barriers to effective public argumentation in the United States right now. I find this issue most concerning for the liberal party. Recalling the last election and the concept of 'incremental' argumentation, I feel that people demonstrated a massive failure of critical thinking by voting for third parties or not voting. People who were disappointed with Hillary Clinton's candidacy in place of Bernie Sanders decided to either continue voting for Bernie or not vote altogether. Neither of these strategies amounted to effective support of their cause, and they constitute the uncritical "knee-jerk" reaction described in this chapter. In this case, uncritical response to opposition worked directly against the interests of the decision-makers. A...

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...