Skip to main content

Blog post 5: Chapter 6


    In chapter 6, the authors introduce case building as a more elaborated and persuasive combination of claims and supports. The concept of the case building is broad, including various forms of presentation, paper, blog and other terms associated with certain spheres (pg. 83). Four preliminary steps in case building are necessary before presenting an argument to the decision makers, and the steps ask for identifying an ultimate purpose, stating clear proposition, assessing presumption as well as the burden of proof, and deciding what is needed for a prima facie case (pg. 89). Then we could start to prepare the case by identifying decision contexts and the starting points which support our claims. After stating issues occur from potential disagreement, we could finally outline the arguments. 
    I am most interested in the following topic about developing a convincing vision. The authors mention that “to make a case is to engage and shape them on behalf of your cause.” A recent song A Scary Time for Boys by Lynzy Lab could be a great example showing how to engage with the audience by developing a convincing vision. It first requires to learn the audience’ vision, which Lab states this wrong vision clearly that “it’s a super scary time today for many men.” Second, by telling the story of your vision, one can persuade the target audience to start questioning their worldview. Third, considering examples is important to support your vision and make your argument become more convincing. In this case, Lab combines the second and the third requirements together by listing many difficulties women face in their daily lives caused by patriarchy society, like being afraid to wear mini skirts; not being able to ride public transportation alone after 7pm; and being uncomfortable leaving a drink unattended, etc. A relevant storytelling could make the target audience realize that their vision is wrong or out of date, and thus they are more likely to consider a new vision.

Rieke, R. D., Sillars, M. O., & Peterson, T. R. (2013). Argumentation and critical decision making. Boston: Pearson.

Comments

  1. Hello Yujia
    I hope you are having a good day! I really enjoy reading your post, and when I was reading it, I have no idea about the song you've mentioned, then I listened to it on YouTube. I like the song, especially the part that mocking boys. But somehow I feel like the song is taking advantage of people's heuristic route of thinking. Lynzy's song mentioned that women are scare of using public transportation after 7 P.M, cannot wear mini skirts, cannot have another drink even if she wants to, and etc. And then she started the hood part of the song which mocking it's the scary time for boys. But as far as I concerned, in my 21 years of life experience, these are all common sense to me. Actually women can do all these, but they have to be careful. I believe men feel the same way when walking alone at night, when they want to have one more drink they would probably consider someone would take advantage of him when he's drunk. If we think more in-depth about this, this song is convincing people in a heuristic way. I totally support feminism, but I just want to talk about how this song convincing people in a heuristic way. Lynzy pulled up some common sense about girls, and then mock boys, the listener will more likely to believe her without any further thinking.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...

Chapter 10

There were a couple of terms I found in this chapter that I wish were explained a little more. First, the concept of uncritical responses to refutation is only covered briefly. I think that this is one of the most fundamental barriers to effective public argumentation in the United States right now. I find this issue most concerning for the liberal party. Recalling the last election and the concept of 'incremental' argumentation, I feel that people demonstrated a massive failure of critical thinking by voting for third parties or not voting. People who were disappointed with Hillary Clinton's candidacy in place of Bernie Sanders decided to either continue voting for Bernie or not vote altogether. Neither of these strategies amounted to effective support of their cause, and they constitute the uncritical "knee-jerk" reaction described in this chapter. In this case, uncritical response to opposition worked directly against the interests of the decision-makers. A...

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...