Skip to main content

Chapter 8

Values are one of the most important parts of an argument and argumentation. Values shape what we believe in and can help us gain adherence or give adherence to certain claims. A value is “a conception… of the desirable that influences the selection from available modes, means and ends of action.” (121)
It is important to keep in mind that everyone has different sets of values, some values will speak more to some people than others; which is why the desirability of a value is important to keep in mind especially when giving an argument in front of a certain audience. Similar to beliefs, values are personal, therefore they can be shared and related to the decision makers in an argument making the claim gain adherence, which is crucial in an argument.

Going back to the ideas of spheres and how they all have specific belief systems and that each sphere a person might be trying to reach will adhere to certain claims over others, well this is similar. Values are personal, and can get to other people just like examples and beliefs values speak to the audience and appeal to the ethos side of the argument. Value systems work in the same way as spheres, the values you share and use during an argument will either be accepted or denied because in reality they aren’t that legitimate to everyone, just like beliefs or examples from stories. This is why it is important to know your audience and who the decision makers are so you can target their value system and make an impact.

Comments

  1. AnonymousNovember 1, 2018 at 11:23 AM

    Values are the core of any argument and therefore it is essential that when a person argues they are able to clearly put their values on display for the opposing side to see. This can make the process of arguing simpler, if both parts understand what each other value, it can help the parts form their arguments in a way that will lead to a sufficient resolution. According to Rokeach, the majority of people have terminal values as their core part of the value system, these are values such as wealth, happiness and health. Most people will agree that the values such as the terminal ones are essential to living a quality life. Just like you stated, it is important to be aware of the type of audience one is speaking in front of and understand that not everyone share the same values, this goes to show that it is important to enter an argument with an open mindset. By doing this one will become a better listener which will enable you to understand the arguments and values the opposing side is putting on display.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 9

In Chapter 9, the authors of the text discuss credibility. The text remarks that credibility is not only able to serve as a claim in argumentation, but it also plays a significant role as a means to support a claim (Rieke, Sillars, & Peterson, 142). The text then goes into detail about characteristics and forms of credibility but finally goes over the general principle the authors suggest for the use of credibility. Credibility can be incredibly subjective, but there are still some general principles of credibility that can apply to most situations. The principle I found to stand out the most in the group of principles the authors presented was the principle of developing credibility from reputation. Reputation is the credibility someone possesses with decision makers before they argue (Rieke, Sillars, & Peterson, 147). When I think of reputation in argument, I always manage to think of the polarized reputation of Donald Trump. There is a significant amount of people who hat
1 comment
Read more

Chapter 10

There were a couple of terms I found in this chapter that I wish were explained a little more. First, the concept of uncritical responses to refutation is only covered briefly. I think that this is one of the most fundamental barriers to effective public argumentation in the United States right now. I find this issue most concerning for the liberal party. Recalling the last election and the concept of 'incremental' argumentation, I feel that people demonstrated a massive failure of critical thinking by voting for third parties or not voting. People who were disappointed with Hillary Clinton's candidacy in place of Bernie Sanders decided to either continue voting for Bernie or not vote altogether. Neither of these strategies amounted to effective support of their cause, and they constitute the uncritical "knee-jerk" reaction described in this chapter. In this case, uncritical response to opposition worked directly against the interests of the decision-makers. A
1 comment
Read more

Blog Post 3- Chapter 4

In chapter 4 we take a look at the importance of understanding argument structures. We are able to look at the Toulmin model. It is a tool that is used to analyze an argument to see the components of one. The model is made up of several different filters to which we can look at an argument. According to the model an argument must have a claim, grounds, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttal/reservation. This tool allows us to analyze an argument and ask the question “Is this a good argument?”. I think this is important because without any criteria as talked about before in chapter 2, an argument won’t have standards to which it has to meet. Also in chapter 4 we take a look at the reasoning processes and what the commonplaces of the reasoning’s are. There are several commonplaces which “Constitute the basis of most arguments” as according to the textbook. (Pg. 57). The processes are, logic or deduction, generalization, cause, sign, analogy and authority. I will look dee
Post a Comment
Read more