Skip to main content

Post 4

The primary focus of Chapter five is to explain the discovery and development process of propositions. We usually have a “feeling of doubt” towards a particular situation or we just sometimes realized there is “some kind of problem.” In this certain situation, what we need to do is to select our proposition. There are six stages of selecting a proposition, but we don’t need to go through all six of them. “Those stages are: identify the question; survey implicated objectives, values, and biases; search for new information; canvas alternate decisions; weigh the costs and risks to alternatives; and then, select a proposition (P.73).”
       I feel like there’s no need to explain each concept from the textbook so I will make examples to show my comprehension to the six stages of selecting a proposition.
Identify a question: Are cats trying to dominate the world?
Search for new information: The cat dominating problem is a difficult one to study because cats and human can rarely communicate with each other, only a few people will be able to communicate with cats, which brings a severe obstacle of the study. We cannot assume cats are dominating the world because of their behavior, but some of their behavior does lead to the purpose of dominating the world.   
Survey implicated objectives, values, and biases: In the long run, I want to figure out whether cats are trying to dominance the world and figure out how to survive. My ideal system will be training some human spies and worm their way into the cat community, and also (hopefully) make some cats turn traitor and work for human. In this study, people who can communicate with cats are playing the key role. Therefore communicator will be paid in a generous amount. I should figure out a way to test their ability of cat language comprehension to prevent them from faking a communicator.  
Canvas alternate decisions:
1. Maintain the status quo: do nothing because cats are not trying to dominating the world.
2. People should stop spoiling their cats to reduce the chance of cats dominating the world.  
3. The U. S. government should encourage people to have another breed of animals as pets. Dogs, rabbits, goldfishes, parrots, and hamsters are cute too!
Weigh the costs and risks to alternatives:
1. If the problem of cats is dominating the world exists then the status quo will bring the predicted negative effects to the world.
2. People who spoil their cats will not buy the idea of cats are dominating the world because they love their cats more than any other individuals.
3. Alternate sources of pets will probably become the next potential risk.  
Select a proposition:

It is significant to study whether cats have a tendency of dominating the world because even if cats are cute, people spoil their cats, cats heal hearts, people will not be willing to be cat’s pets eventually.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chapter 10

There were a couple of terms I found in this chapter that I wish were explained a little more. First, the concept of uncritical responses to refutation is only covered briefly. I think that this is one of the most fundamental barriers to effective public argumentation in the United States right now. I find this issue most concerning for the liberal party. Recalling the last election and the concept of 'incremental' argumentation, I feel that people demonstrated a massive failure of critical thinking by voting for third parties or not voting. People who were disappointed with Hillary Clinton's candidacy in place of Bernie Sanders decided to either continue voting for Bernie or not vote altogether. Neither of these strategies amounted to effective support of their cause, and they constitute the uncritical "knee-jerk" reaction described in this chapter. In this case, uncritical response to opposition worked directly against the interests of the decision-makers. A...
1 comment
Read more

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...
Post a Comment
Read more