Skip to main content

Chapter 11


Fallacies are, at their core, illogical arguments, and most people who are familiar with basic argumentation are familiar with the concept of a logical fallacy. However, many people are unaware of what can be defined as a fallacy, and this can lead to people making arguments that they believe to be logically sound when in reality they are anything but. A common example of this is the fallacy of begging the question. The book says that begging the question occurs when an arguer assumes that the point they are trying to prove is true when making their argument, and using that assumption as support for another claim. This can be especially problematic when partisan media is involved, as people can receive biased news and then use it as support for another claim. An example of this would be someone arguing in favor of using tear gas on immigrants because of the need to keep out people who will hurt our country and citizens after hearing on Fox News that immigrants are dangerous. The point at issue in most immigration debates is whether immigrants are helpful or harmful to the United States, so by using the claim that they are harmful as support for another argument is a fallacy of begging the question. Using unproven information as support for further arguments is an error that many people make in their everyday lives, and it often goes unnoticed because to many this error doesn’t fit the classical definition of illogical.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chapter 10

There were a couple of terms I found in this chapter that I wish were explained a little more. First, the concept of uncritical responses to refutation is only covered briefly. I think that this is one of the most fundamental barriers to effective public argumentation in the United States right now. I find this issue most concerning for the liberal party. Recalling the last election and the concept of 'incremental' argumentation, I feel that people demonstrated a massive failure of critical thinking by voting for third parties or not voting. People who were disappointed with Hillary Clinton's candidacy in place of Bernie Sanders decided to either continue voting for Bernie or not vote altogether. Neither of these strategies amounted to effective support of their cause, and they constitute the uncritical "knee-jerk" reaction described in this chapter. In this case, uncritical response to opposition worked directly against the interests of the decision-makers. A...
1 comment
Read more

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...
Post a Comment
Read more