Skip to main content

Chapter 8

Value is the part of the argument that puts meaning behind what one is trying to argue. Throughout an argument the goal is to put ones values on display for others and use those values to drive the cause of your argument. In chapter 8, the book define value as “a conception of the desirable” (p.122). Then it goes on to explaining how a value can be both positive and negative, for every positive value statement there will always be at least one antithesis. When it comes to arguing values, there are two different ways of doing so, one can either present other positive values that opposes the already stated values, or one can bring up negative values which one connects to the positive values that have been presented.

There are also terminal and instrumental values that each individual has in their core of values. These values include the ends a person admire, such as happiness, wealth, health and so on. Tese sort of values will also reflect the means which a person value in order to reach the ends, these can be hard work, responsibility, helpfulness, faith, among other things. According to studies done by Rokeach, terminal values are the ones that are in the center focus of an individual’s value system. Most people in order to achieve their terminal values such as wealth, they need to apply instrumental values such as hard work, so they use the means that they might value to obtain the ends that they value.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chapter 10

There were a couple of terms I found in this chapter that I wish were explained a little more. First, the concept of uncritical responses to refutation is only covered briefly. I think that this is one of the most fundamental barriers to effective public argumentation in the United States right now. I find this issue most concerning for the liberal party. Recalling the last election and the concept of 'incremental' argumentation, I feel that people demonstrated a massive failure of critical thinking by voting for third parties or not voting. People who were disappointed with Hillary Clinton's candidacy in place of Bernie Sanders decided to either continue voting for Bernie or not vote altogether. Neither of these strategies amounted to effective support of their cause, and they constitute the uncritical "knee-jerk" reaction described in this chapter. In this case, uncritical response to opposition worked directly against the interests of the decision-makers. A...
1 comment
Read more

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...
Post a Comment
Read more