Skip to main content

Chapter 16


  In Chapter 16, the authors of the textbook talk about argumentation in the political sphere, which is the oldest recorded argumentation sphere. In general, political argumentation is a process of “using verbal and visual arguments to influence the policy decisions of a political community” (p. 278), and it is characterized by the use of policy claims. I am particularly interested in the third major subspheres of political argumentation, which is political campaign. It involves not only complicated policy issues but also images of candidates. I personally believe that the most important element of political campaigns is credibility. Candidates must be well prepared with solid evidence and stories, so that they could present credible political claims and develop convincing images toward the public. All the slogans and content candidates say could be vital for the success of their political campaign. For example, the approval rating of the president Trump has been decreased since he made inappropriate claims about media coverages and progressive actions towards the LGBTQ community. He keeps saying that many mainstream newspaper organizations like CNN is filled with fake news, and he uses this claim every time when he is asked by questions that he does not want to respond. In addition, there are news reports recently that the concept of transgender could be defined out of existence under Trump administration. Such these actions fail to build a trusting and satisfying image of a political figure. It is important for us to study political argumentation nowadays, for it helps the public to develop a better understanding of the necessity for participating in the political process and how we should use our rights to vote for suitable and capable candidates.
Rieke, R. D., Sillars, M. O., & Peterson, T. R. (2013). Argumentation and critical decision making. Boston: Pearson.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Building

Chapter 6 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making focuses on the steps required in building a case. Among the concepts that are discussed, visualization stands out as one of the most important. On page 101, the authors even state “Powerful arguments are only half of the job in preparing a case or presentation. The other half is developing a convincing vision through which you can tell the story of your ultimate purpose” In other words, having a great argument alone is not going to necessarily gain you adherence. Instead, it needs to be supplemented with a story that vividly shows the decision maker the outcome if they were to agree to the proposition.   The chapter goes on to say that to create a powerful vision you must know the decision maker’s narrative of the subject you are arguing about. The example that is given is college. Some decision makers might have had the greatest time of their lives in college during which they made a ton of friends and found love. On the ...
1 comment
Read more