Skip to main content

chap8

Values are important in argumentation because they are what people ultimately use as the foundation of their decisions. Whether decision makers stick with the values that they come into an argument with or the presenters convince them to adopt new values, the decision reflects the collective values of the decision making group because people prefer not to take actions that violate their own values. Furthermore, when the values held by decision makers do not align, they must make arguments among themselves, but ultimately the decision will reflect some values held within the group. Because of this idea that decisions lie fundamentally on values held by decision makers, they make for good starting points. In situations where values are held commonly among decision makers identifying starting points can be easy, but if not, establishing values to build off of can be an integral part of the argument itself. Understanding the audience and the values that they hold is crucial to the preparation of the argument and can aid in deciding how to allocate time spent on a given part of an argument.
Since values are based on personal experience and ideology, they are inherently various and also subject to change. Stemming from this is a sort of dilemma of using values in argumentation: While values carry great influence and are necessary to gain adherence, they are also unstable, and thus can create precedents that may make sense at the time, but often do not hold validity in the future. For example, as the value of a young, nuclear family, often held by Americans, dwindles, it has become less practical for young people to marry and have kids, and more practical for them to continue their education and earn a more prestigious career.  For this, many decisions do not stand up to the test of time because the values upon which they were made have been modified or replaced completely. While values are essential in gaining adherence in argumentation, they should be understood as non-static, and thus the decisions based on them, not forever concrete.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Building

Chapter 6 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making focuses on the steps required in building a case. Among the concepts that are discussed, visualization stands out as one of the most important. On page 101, the authors even state “Powerful arguments are only half of the job in preparing a case or presentation. The other half is developing a convincing vision through which you can tell the story of your ultimate purpose” In other words, having a great argument alone is not going to necessarily gain you adherence. Instead, it needs to be supplemented with a story that vividly shows the decision maker the outcome if they were to agree to the proposition.   The chapter goes on to say that to create a powerful vision you must know the decision maker’s narrative of the subject you are arguing about. The example that is given is college. Some decision makers might have had the greatest time of their lives in college during which they made a ton of friends and found love. On the ...
1 comment
Read more