Skip to main content

Chapter 7

Chapter 7 of the text examines the various forms of evidence that can be presented in support of an argument. It defines predominantly three kinds: examples, statistics, and testimony. The text defines examples as “undeveloped instances used in an argument by generalization.” Examples are of course things that have really happened. So using them in an argument is a way of confronting someone with a piece of reality they may not be totally accepting of. Statistics are numerical in nature and constitute summaries of examples. Numbers can often be more convincing than mere anecdotes in an argument and can be used to really bolster an argument. Testimony is of course a direct statement taken from another person in support of an argument. Attaching an example to a person can be quite useful in supporting an argument.
I think that these types of evidence are extremely interesting to look at in the context of political debates. Arguments are made in the political area perhaps more than anywhere else, and I think that it is very easy to pick out which type of evidence that is being used in any argument. Examples, statistics, and testimony are all very common and are used very effectively in political discourse to create and support arguments.

Comments

  1. AnonymousOctober 23, 2018 at 3:08 PM

    I think that you did a very good job highlighting the main points of this chapter. I'd like to dive into political debates more in this response. I think that you bring up a really good point; political debates use a lot of argumentation and the most effective ones use a mix of the three sources of evidence that you provided (examples, statistics and testimony). What I have found interesting lately is how often evidence has been disregarded in political debates or other political situations. Statistics and examples of climate change and melting ice have been provided to prove that global warming is real; yet it is being denied by government officials. A variety of seemingly credible testimonies were given against Kavanaugh, yet he still got confirmed. This class has taught us that if we have strong evidence to support our arguments, we are more likely to win, yet society has proven this to be false time and time again lately. Do you think there is a way that these arguments could be better presented? Obviously, the values and worldviews are not aligning with the audience, but why not? I genuinely don't know how to get points across when the three main forms of evidence aren't enough.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Building

Chapter 6 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making focuses on the steps required in building a case. Among the concepts that are discussed, visualization stands out as one of the most important. On page 101, the authors even state “Powerful arguments are only half of the job in preparing a case or presentation. The other half is developing a convincing vision through which you can tell the story of your ultimate purpose” In other words, having a great argument alone is not going to necessarily gain you adherence. Instead, it needs to be supplemented with a story that vividly shows the decision maker the outcome if they were to agree to the proposition.   The chapter goes on to say that to create a powerful vision you must know the decision maker’s narrative of the subject you are arguing about. The example that is given is college. Some decision makers might have had the greatest time of their lives in college during which they made a ton of friends and found love. On the ...
1 comment
Read more