Skip to main content

Chapter 7


Chapter 7 focused on evidence, and how different types of evidence can be effective forms of support. In my opinion, the most effective form of evidence is personal experience, or evidence that speaks to the relevancy of decision makers’ lives. Using personal experience can be effective in arguments because usually, people don’t care about statistics, or at the very least find them difficult to rationalize. This is even more true if someone’s own personal experience acts as evidence in contrast of statistics. For example, the Department of Motor Vehicle Safety claims that in 2016, 10,497 people died from alcohol related driving crashes, accounting for 28% of all traffic deaths in the United States. This statistic shows that a significant number of deaths result from drunk driving, and the dangers of drunk driving are well communicated across all forms of media. The Department of Motor Vehicles certainly has credibility when it comes it discussing traffic deaths, and so it would stand to reason that people would take adherence to this argument when presented with these statistics and make the decision to not drive drunk. However, I know people in my life who will still make the decision to drive while under the influence of alcohol, on the grounds that they had done it before and everything turned out fine. This is a perfect example of people weighing their own personal experience as more credible than statistics compiled over thousands of traffic deaths. Statistics often aren’t effective because they are impersonal, and a common response a person might have when confronted with statistics is to say, “That won’t happen to me”. Personal experiences, or even hypothetical examples, are the most effective form of evidence to use as support for an argument because decision makers are more likely to grant adherence to argument if they can relate to it.

Comments

  1. AnonymousOctober 22, 2018 at 8:41 AM

    I would agree with what you say about personal experience being the strongest form of evidence. You mentioned over ten thousand people died from alcohol related accidents, seeing the statistics is one thing and one way to warn people about drinking and driving or going in a car with someone under the influence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nate AndersonOctober 24, 2018 at 7:28 AM

    I think that your example definitely shows that personal experience is powerful in the personal sphere, even when it encourages decisions that are likely not the best for the safety of the person or people involved.

    Another example of personal experience related to DUIs is the use of people whose lives have been damaged by it. Often PSAs use personal testimony from people who have caused harm to others by driving under the influence, or people whose lives have been affected by someone who drove under the influence. These advertisements are particularly effective because they demonstrate strong support against the decision to drive while under the influence but they cross over into the personal sphere. Often these ads show the same "it won't happen to me" attitude, but counter it by showing the effect. While these advertisements are meant to demonstrate a point to the public, they also confront arguments that take place in the personal sphere.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Building

Chapter 6 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making focuses on the steps required in building a case. Among the concepts that are discussed, visualization stands out as one of the most important. On page 101, the authors even state “Powerful arguments are only half of the job in preparing a case or presentation. The other half is developing a convincing vision through which you can tell the story of your ultimate purpose” In other words, having a great argument alone is not going to necessarily gain you adherence. Instead, it needs to be supplemented with a story that vividly shows the decision maker the outcome if they were to agree to the proposition.   The chapter goes on to say that to create a powerful vision you must know the decision maker’s narrative of the subject you are arguing about. The example that is given is college. Some decision makers might have had the greatest time of their lives in college during which they made a ton of friends and found love. On the ...
1 comment
Read more