For this weeks blog post, I will be focusing on Chapter 12: Argumentation in Law and the concept of using narrative in legal argumentation, specifically regarding federal civil law. There are many aspects about narrative in law that are distinctive and very different from what most people would consider a narrative to be. Narrative in law is a matter of presenting evidence in a specific manner that would persuade lawmakers, jurors, and other decision makers to grant adherence to the given claim.
The use of narratives in this specific sphere of argumentation is very unique compared to other spheres. There are many outside factors that contribute to the specific construction of narratives in law such as time, validity, technicality, consistency, and more. Although many of those aspects apply to general argumentation, they are much more specified in legal cases because of the specific rules in a court of law. Narratives are used when a lawyer is representing their client and have to construct specific information that pertains to their argumentative case. This consists of facts, evidence, people involved, motives, disputed actions, outcomes of the actions, and more. These various aspects must be framed as assertions that relate to specific themes, story categories, causal connection, and connections between the story and its legality to successfully employ the use of narrative.
An interesting current event that relates to the use of narrative in argumentative law practices is Kim Kardashian West’s use of narrative in her efforts to create new prison reforms. Kardashian West used her celebrity status and powerful platform to shed led on this issue in the United States. She specifically focused on the case of Alice Johnson who was sentenced to prison for life because of a non-violent drug offence. Ms. Johnson was sentenced in 1996 and served over 20 years in prison until Kardashian West began to lobby for her release. She specifically used authority in her narrative to gain traction by reaching out to Ivanka Trump, then being directed to Jared Kushner and President Donald Trump. Kushner has a very strong say as the white house senior advisor who was specifically handling new prison reforms at the White House. Kardashians narrative was technical and valid as she had a private meeting with the President that used different burdens of proof and persuasive tactics to support her claim that Alice Johnson was wrongfully sentenced to prison for life. Her case was successful as President Trump granted a clemency plea for Alice Johnson who was soon freed from prison. Kardashian West was very logical in representing Alice Johnson as she presented different facts to develop her narrative and successfully free Alice Johnson.
The use of narratives in this specific sphere of argumentation is very unique compared to other spheres. There are many outside factors that contribute to the specific construction of narratives in law such as time, validity, technicality, consistency, and more. Although many of those aspects apply to general argumentation, they are much more specified in legal cases because of the specific rules in a court of law. Narratives are used when a lawyer is representing their client and have to construct specific information that pertains to their argumentative case. This consists of facts, evidence, people involved, motives, disputed actions, outcomes of the actions, and more. These various aspects must be framed as assertions that relate to specific themes, story categories, causal connection, and connections between the story and its legality to successfully employ the use of narrative.
An interesting current event that relates to the use of narrative in argumentative law practices is Kim Kardashian West’s use of narrative in her efforts to create new prison reforms. Kardashian West used her celebrity status and powerful platform to shed led on this issue in the United States. She specifically focused on the case of Alice Johnson who was sentenced to prison for life because of a non-violent drug offence. Ms. Johnson was sentenced in 1996 and served over 20 years in prison until Kardashian West began to lobby for her release. She specifically used authority in her narrative to gain traction by reaching out to Ivanka Trump, then being directed to Jared Kushner and President Donald Trump. Kushner has a very strong say as the white house senior advisor who was specifically handling new prison reforms at the White House. Kardashians narrative was technical and valid as she had a private meeting with the President that used different burdens of proof and persuasive tactics to support her claim that Alice Johnson was wrongfully sentenced to prison for life. Her case was successful as President Trump granted a clemency plea for Alice Johnson who was soon freed from prison. Kardashian West was very logical in representing Alice Johnson as she presented different facts to develop her narrative and successfully free Alice Johnson.
Comments
Post a Comment