Skip to main content

Chapter 12


I chose to reflect on chapter 12 about argumentation in law.  When reading this chapter, I found that it was a culmination of almost everything we have learned this semester.  There is a lot of talk about the burden of proof and how when arguing in court both parties need to have enough evidence to prove that they are innocent/have been wronged.  It is up to the judge and/or jury at that point to decide what the appropriate decision is.  This chapter really focused on a specific case about discriminatory pay.  It was interesting to read about the different perspectives that were taken.  It was a good reminder that, when making an argument, it is incredibly important to be aware of who is going to be most important when making the decision.  In this chapter, I got a sense of the importance to always fight for what is right.  So, while we learned all of these things in about argumentation, remember that you need to make things work for you.  For hundreds of years, people have been manipulating the rules and working around common places to be sure that they got what they wanted.  Today, while the rules are important, use them to do good, and don’t let other people use the same rules to stop you. 

Comments

  1. AnonymousDecember 5, 2018 at 9:08 AM

    Hey Kelly!

    I also wrote about Chapter 12, I thought it was a very interesting chapter because like you stated right away it basically incorporated many important terms that we've previously discussed and did a great job of connecting these terms for us! There was a lot of talk about burden of proof , because I think this is an important term for us in the field of argumentation. Burden of proof is known as the "the obligation to prove one's assertion." This is basically defending your point, your views regarding the issue at hand, and that you must supply proof for your audience to just accept and embrace all of your points. Another key term that you mentioned was commonplaces, I feel like this is important to consider because everyone comes from a different place, and has different feelings towards certain issues.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chap 5

Chapter five focuses primarily on identifying and developing propositions for problems that people think are relevant. It goes over 6 steps for choosing a valid proposition based on a perceived “feeling of doubt.” While all six steps may not be necessary, the collectively ensure a well thought out and firm proposition. The six steps include identifying the question, surveying implicated objectives (or understanding what is the goal accomplishment in regard to the question), searching for new information, considering alternative options, considering costs and risks of each potential proposition, and then finally choosing one of the propositions. The authors then go on to talk about analyzing and strengthening the proposition chosen. This includes identification and ranking of the issues that the proposition addresses as well as understanding how the decision makers will react to these issues and propositions. In general, with all these methods of critically analyzing the proposition, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chaper 8

Chapter 8 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making continues down the route of talking about support for argumentation. This chapter specifically focuses on values as support for arguments, how to recognize them and the best ways to attack them. Values are defined as “ concepts of what is desirable that arguers use and decision makers understand” (121).  There are several types of values mentioned such as stated, implied, positive, negative, terminal, instrumental, abstract and concrete values.  Stated values are state directly what concepts they hold. For example, words such as “freedom” or “health” are stated values because they mean exactly what they're trying to portray. Not all values are as explicit. Some are more vague and called implied values. One of the examples that the book uses to show the contrast between the two is in the case of work equality. When talking about the subject saying, “ Equal pay for equal work” would be a stated value and “ Women deserve th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Case Building

Chapter 6 of Argumentation and Critical Decision Making focuses on the steps required in building a case. Among the concepts that are discussed, visualization stands out as one of the most important. On page 101, the authors even state “Powerful arguments are only half of the job in preparing a case or presentation. The other half is developing a convincing vision through which you can tell the story of your ultimate purpose” In other words, having a great argument alone is not going to necessarily gain you adherence. Instead, it needs to be supplemented with a story that vividly shows the decision maker the outcome if they were to agree to the proposition.   The chapter goes on to say that to create a powerful vision you must know the decision maker’s narrative of the subject you are arguing about. The example that is given is college. Some decision makers might have had the greatest time of their lives in college during which they made a ton of friends and found love. On the ...
1 comment
Read more